|

1. Assesses type 2 diabetes risk
deCODE T2™ is test that measures four DNA markers which
are widely replicated genetic risk factors for type 2 diabetes
(T2D). It defines genetic risk for T2D, independent of family
history and obesity, that ranges from 0.6 to 2.2 fold the general
population risk.
deCODE T2™, like other DNA based tests for common disease,
is a risk assessment test as it measures DNA risk markers that
are not determinative but associate with the disease in certain
proportion of the patients. Patients with higher genetic risk
are not destined to develop T2D and conversely, patients with
lower genetic risk are not immune from diabetes. There are other
risk factors not measured by the deCODE T2™ test. DNA markers
for common disease simply are risk markers comparable to biomarkers
such as LDL-cholesterol and PSA that predict risk for cardiovascular
diseases and prostate cancer respectively.
By knowing and understanding genetic risk, it may be possible
to take actions that reduce or minimize the likelihood of an individuals
developing diabetes. In addition to predicting or recalculating
the remaining lifetime risk of developing T2D, the deCODE T2™
results can predict the likelihood of prediabetes converting to
full blown T2D and which patients may benefit the most from preventive
management.
2. Assesses risk for the prediabetic pateints
deCODE T2™ offers new means to help physicians decide which
prediabetic patients are at 50 to 70% absolute risk for converting
T2D within 3 to 4 years compared to the baseline risk of 30% in
overweight or obese prediabetics. These high-risk patients therefore
may benefit the most from more aggressive management either through
lifestyle modification or drug treatment. The 2008 ADA recommendations
on management of prediabetics state: “In addition to lifestyle
counseling, metformin may be considered in those who are at very
high risk (combined IFG and IGT plus other risk factors) and who
are obese and under 60 years of age.” deCODE T2™ is
one of the strongest risk factors for conversion.
Prediabetic patients with higher genetic risk for T2D, may be
more compliant with weight loss recommendations by their physicians.
For patients who fail to lose significant weight within 6 months,
high risk prediabetics may benefit the most from nutritional advice
and more aggressive lifestyle intervention. Finally, high risk
prediabetics who still fail to respond to lifestyle intervention,
would be prime candidates for metformin as suggested by the latest
ADA recommendations.
3. Identify type 2 diabetics who respond poorly to sulfonylurea
Regarding patients who already have T2D studies in two populations
show that those who have two copies of the risk variant at TCF7L2,
one of the genes included in deCODE T2™, have much lower
response to sulfonylurea, with only 36% meeting HbA1C target of
7% or lower, versus 62% of those who do not have two copies (Pearson,
E.R., et al., Diabetes, 2007. 56(8): p. 2178-82 and American Diabetes
Association 67th Scientific Sessions, 2007). Metformin response
on the other hand did not depend on the TCF7L2 genotype, meaning
that patients who have the high-risk TCF7L2 genotype are likely
to respond better to metformin than sulfonylureas.
Genetic Markers
The DNA markers included in deCODE T2™ are located in or
near the following genes: TCF7L2, PPARG, CDKAL1, and CDKN2A and
have each been widely replicated in 10 to 40 independent populations.
TCF7L2 is the strongest genetic risk factor discovered so far
for Type 2 diabetes and has been validated in over 40 populations
spanning several ethnicities. The TCF7L2 marker correlates with
lower insulin secretion in response to oral glucose. deCODE T2™
combines the risk due to TCF7L2 with the three other widely validated
genes. The T2 genetic profile derived for each patient is based
on a reference set of tens of thousands of patients and controls.
This genetic profile defines risk ranges from 0.6 to 2.2 compared
to the risk in the general population. About 40 % of the population
has a genotype combination of the tested markers that have an
increased relative risk (>1) over the general population, about
8% of the population have 1.5 to 2.2 relative risk, about 3% of
the population have genotype combinations that confer a 1.8 to
2.2 fold relative risk.
The deCODE T2™ genetic risk profile is independent of other
risk factors for type 2 diabetes such as family history, obesity,
prediabetes, and ethnicity. The genetic risk can be multiplied
by the other risk factors not measured by this test to derive
a composite risk relative to that in the general population. Therefore,
this test is useful for patients with or without family history
of T2D.
1. TCF7L2
The TCF7L2 gene is by far the strongest genetic risk factor discovered
so far for Type 2 diabetes and is responsible at the population
level for more T2D cases than all the other identified variants
combined. Since deCODE’s publication in 2006 (Grant, S.F.,
et al., Nat Genet, 2006. 38(3): p. 320-3) about 40 independent
studies around the globe have validated its association to T2D.
About 8 - 11% of the general population (of European or African
descent) carry two copies of the risk variant, compared to about
twice that number of type 2 diabetics. The frequencies are lower
in Asian and Hispanic populations but the relative risk is the
same.
Having two copies of the risk variant has been shown to correspond
to an approximate doubling of the likelihood of developing T2D
compared to the most common genotype (no copies). (Remember that
we all have two copies of each chromosome in every cell in our
bodies. We inherit one copy from our mother, and one from our
father.) The risk variant is the T allele of SNP rs7903146, located
within the transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene.
A published U.S. government supported clinical trial involving
thousands of overweight and obese prediabetics, the Diabetes Prevention
Program, and a European study, the Diabetes Prevention Study,
showed that prediabetics with two copies of the risk variant were
at a 1.8 to 2 times greater risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes
within the next three to four years as were prediabetics with
one or no copies of the risk variant (that is a 50 to 70% absolute
risk to convert compared to a baseline conversion rate of 30 to
35% for overweight and obese prediabetics). Approximately 20%
of prediabetics who went on to develop T2D in these studies carried
two copies of the risk variant compared to 11% of study participants
overall.
Importantly, this study also showed that this increased risk could
be effectively reduced through weight loss and treatment with
metformin. Furthermore, the 2008 ADA guidelines : “In addition
to lifestyle counseling, metformin may be considered in those
who are at very high risk (combined IFG and IGT plus other risk
factors) and who are obese and under 60 years of age.”
Increased genetic risk results according to deCODE T2™,
including TCF7L2 is one of the strongest risk factors for conversion.
2. CDKAL1
deCODE genetic has recently shown that a sequence variant in the
CDKAL1 gene can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes
by about 30%. (Steinthorsdottir, V et al. Nat Genet. 2007; 39:770-5).
The function of the CDKAL1 gene is unknown but it is expressed
in the insulin secreting pancreatic beta cells. Furthermore, this
variant affects pancreatic beta cell function as carriers secrete
less insulin in response to glucose than those who do not carry
the variant.
3. PPARG
A large number of studies have shown that a sequence variant in
the PPARG gene affects the risk of developing type 2 diabetes
(Deeb, SS et al. Nat Genet. 1998; 20:284-287; Altshuler, D et
al. Nat Genet. 2000; 26:76-80; Saxena, R et al Science 2007; 316:1331-6;
Zeggini, E et al Science 2007; 316:1336-41; Scott, LJ et al. Science
2007; 316:1341-5). This variant is termed Pro12Ala as it changes
a proline in position 12 in one isoform of the protein to an alanine.
The common proline variant is thought possibly to confer increased
risk of T2D through a decrease in insulin sensitivity. A meta-analysis
of three large studies, including a total of 14,586 cases and
17,968 control individuals of European decent, shows that each
copy of the major allele of this variant carries with it a 1.14
fold increase in risk of developing T2D compared to those who
do not carry the variant. (Altshuler, D et al. Nat Genet. 2000;
26:76-80). Even though the PPAR gamma protein is a receptor for
thiazolidinediones (class of T2D drugs), current evidence to suggest
that the Pro12Ala variant has no effect on the therapeutic efficacy
of this class of drugs.
4. CDKN2A
A sequence variant on chromosome 9p21 was recently shown to confer
risk of type 2 diabetes with a relative risk of 1.06 compared
to the general population (Saxena, R et al Science 2007; 316:1331-6;
Zeggini, E et al Science 2007; 316:1336-41; Scott, LJ et al. Science
2007; 316:1341-5). There are no genes overlapping this variant
but the nearest genes are CDKN2A and CDKN2B. It is not known if
the sequence variant exerts its effect on type 2 diabetes through
these genes or through some other unknown mechanism.
Explanation of risk assessment
The deCODE T2™ genetic risk profile reported for your patient
is simply the risk of each DNA marker multiplied by each other
and ranges from 0.6 to 2.2 fold. This is justified based on large
studies which showed that each genetic marker is an independent
risk factor for T2D.
The remaining lifetime risk is defined as the risk to develop
T2D after a certain age, assuming the patient has not already
been diagnosed with T2D. It is dependent on known risk factors,
such as obesity, ethnicity, family history, prediabetes, and age.
The genetic risk identified by the deCODE T2™ test is largely
independent of any other risk factors that the patient may have
and therefore may be multiplied by the relative risks conferred
by them.
The remaining lifetime risk for an individual (see table below)
can be multiplied by the combined genetic risk identified by deCODE
T2™ profile to obtain his/her specific residual lifetime
risk. For example, for an overweight white male who is 45 years
of age, the remaining lifetime risk according to the table is
23.7%. If his identified deCODE T2™ is 1.8 his remaining
lifetime risk has increased to 42.6% However, not all genetic
risk factors are known or measured by deCODE T2™ but deCODE
T2 measures the strongest known and validated markers.
Remaining lifetime risk by age, BMI, race and sex (modified from
Naryan et al. JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1884-90)
The deCODE T2™ may therefore provide a new means to help
physicians to decide which prediabetics they wish to treat more
aggressively either through lifestyle change or through drug treatment.
Published studies have shown that certain medications do appear
to effectively slow the rate of progression from prediabetes to
T2D. The 2002 Diabetes Prevention Program study showed that metformin
could decrease conversion by 31% overall and even higher in patients
younger than 60 ( N Engl J Med 346, op. cit.). Recent ADA guidelines
state: “In addition to lifestyle counseling, metformin may
be considered in those who are at very high risk (combined IFG
and IGT plus other risk factors) and who are obese and under 60
years of age”

deCODE AF™ is a DNA-based test aimed at detecting Atrial
Fibrillation (AF) and subsequently choose the appropriate follow
up treatment.
deCODE AF™ detects versions of two common single-letter
variations in the genome (also known as SNPs) on chromosome 4q25
that deCODE has identified as major risk factors for atrial fibrillation
(AF). deCODE discovered these genetic markers and has published
them in a peer-reviewed journal (Nature 2007: Variants conferring
risk of atrial fibrillation on chromosome 4q25).
The article can be found under "Letters" in Nature's
"Advance online publication".
AF is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia, or irregular
heart rhythm, and is the leading cause of cardiogenic stroke.
Between 15 and 20 percent of all strokes are cardiogenic, the
subtype with the highest morbidity and mortality.
By providing a better understanding of an individual’s risk,
deCODE AF™ may enable doctors to identify those patients
who may benefit from outpatient cardiac monitoring for undiagnosed
AF. Published research and best clinical practice suggest that
individuals with AF, and with a history of stroke or with other
risk factors, can significantly reduce their risk of stroke through
treatment with the anticoagulant drug, warfarin.
Some stroke patients have intermittent AF and may no longer be
in AF when they arrive at an emergency room. Many of these may
not be diagnosed during the standard 24 to 48 hours of inpatient
cardiac monitoring. As a result, these patients may be placed
on an antiplatelet agent rather than much more effective warfarin
treatment for secondary prevention of AF-related stroke. More
extensive outpatient cardiac monitoring is not routinely done
due to the expense involved. deCODE AF™ offers a novel means
of meeting this challenge – of identifying those who may
benefit from outpatient cardiac monitoring after leaving the hospital,
and thereby detecting a greater proportion of AF cases .
deCODE AF™ can only be ordered with the written informed
consent of the individual to be tested accompanied by the authorization
of a physician. Because deCODE believes this test is useful for
informing monitoring and treatment strategies for those who have
suffered either ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack,
we recommend that physicians read through this site and the information
it contains and then review it fully with their patients, in order
to explain what atrial fibrillation is and why the information
yielded by the risk test may, together with analysis of other
risk factors, be useful for providing the best possible prevention
strategy for future stroke.
Genetic Markers
The key to developing a clinically useful DNA-based test for
risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the identification of common
genetic variants that confer significantly increased risk of the
condition. deCODE AF™ detects the first two SNPs that meet
this criteria and that have been shown to confer risk in multiple
populations.
To identify genetic variants conferring risk of AF in the general
population, deCODE conducted a genome-wide analysis of more than
300,000 SNPs across the entire genome in a cohort of a total of
5,000 Icelandic AF patients and healthy controls. Alleles (bases)
of two SNPs, rs2200733 and rs100233464, both located near the
PITX2 gene on chromosome 4q25, were found to be significantly
more common in AF patients than in control subjects. The PITX2
gene is known to play a role in cardiac development.
These findings were then validated in studies of a total of more
than 18,000 patients with all forms of AF and controls, including
cohorts from Iceland, Sweden, the Massachusetts General Hospital
in Boston, and, for the strongest of the variants, a cohort of
Han Chinese from Hong Kong. The deCODE AF test measures the at-risk
versions of these two SNPs. Approximately 30% of those of European
ancestry in deCODE’s studies are positive for the deCODE
AF™ test, corresponding to an average 2-fold increase in
likelihood of AF compared to those negative for the test.
Risk assessment
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death, and its burden
on the healthcare system is increasing with the aging of the population.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the leading cause of cardiogenic stroke,
the subtype of the disease with the highest morbidity and mortality.
It has been shown that treatment with warfarin can reduce the
risk of stroke in those with AF by about 70%.
Two studies have shown that an extra week of ambulatory cardiac
monitoring using an automated digital event recorder following
a stroke may identify AF in another 5.6 to 14.3% of stroke survivors.
These include many who would originally be given the diagnosis
of stroke of unknown etiology as well as carotid atherosclerosis-related
stroke. Monitoring all ischemic stroke patients in an ambulatory
setting is often considered too expensive roughly one-third of
post-stroke and post-TIA patients are at hight risk for atrial
fibrillation, especially when the etiology is not clear deCODE
AF™ may identify patients who have intermittent AF and who
are thus at high risk of recurrent stroke. Warfarin treatment
of these cases may decrease the future costs of morbidity and
mortality that more than outweighs the extra cost of testing and
monitoring.
With the widespread current use of statins, the incidence of myocardial
infarction is slowly decreasing. By contrast, the rate of stroke
is increasing as a higher proportion of the population survives
to the age of higher risk of stroke. It is also clear that statins
have only about half the effect on stroke prevention as they do
on MI prevention. Part of this may be because much of AF is not
related to atherosclerosis. Therefore, we may expect the proportion
of stroke due to diagnosed and undiagnosed AF to continue to increase
as the atherosclerosis-related strokes are decreased by statins
and anti-platelet agents. In order to effectively address AF-related
strokes, a test such as deCODE AF™ may improve AF detection
which can enable physicians to personalize the treatment of those
with AF, delivering the benefits of warfarin to those who need
it.

The deCODE BreastCancer™ test determines whether the subject
has inherited the risk or non-risk version at 7 different variable
sites in the human genome. By comparing deCODE BreastCancer™
test results to the general risk of women in the population it
can be seen whether the person tested has a risk greater or lower
than the average population risk. The risks at each of the 7 markers
are multiplied together to define combined risks from 0.4-to 4.0-
fold the relative general population risk. The deCODE BreastCancerTM
test examines only genetic risk factors, so other factors such
as age and hormonal factors need also to be taken into account.
By combining the test results and risks associated with other
known risk factors, a more complete lifetime risk estimate can
be generated.
The test is done on the DNA isolated from an inner cheek or a
blood sample, and it looks at 7 marker variants (SNPs, single
nucleotide polymorphisms) in the genome that people inherit from
their parents and have been associated with increased risk for
breast cancer. These variations are very common in the population
but have been shown to affect a woman’s risk of getting
breast cancer. The test’s validity in identifying risk for
breast cancer has been confirmed in a number of large, multinational
studies including more than 10,000 patients and 30,000 controls.
According to the test results, only about 5% of women have an
average 2-fold risk for breast cancer compared to the general
population, and about 1% have a 3-fold risk. This translates for
white women to a lifetime risk of 24% and 36%, respectively, versus
the average population-based risk of 12%. It is estimated that
these 7 markers together account for 60% of breast cancer (population
attributable risk).
Breast cancers can be classified as either estrogen receptor
positive (ER+) or estrogen receptor negative (ER-), depending
on whether they contain certain proteins that allow the cancer
to respond to the female sex hormone estrogen, which can make
the breast tissues more susceptible to hormonal risk factors and
drive small tumors into larger tumors. Several of the genetic
variants examined by the deCODE BreastCancerTM test affect the
chance that a breast tumor, if it arises, will be ER+ or ER-.
At the same time, ER+ tumors may be more amenable to prevention
by drugs that target the estrogen pathway, such as tamoxifen.
The deCODE BreastCancerTM test does not test for what is generally
referred to as familial or inherited forms of breast cancer caused
by rare mutations in breast cancer genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2,
TP53, and PTEN. These mutations confer extremely high risks of
breast cancer and occur only in rare families that may have exceptionally
high numbers of breast cancer cases, often arising in younger
women and sometimes along with ovarian cancer. Mutations in these
genes need to be tested for separately under the guidance of a
genetic counselor. However, for individuals who are known to carry
mutations in these genes, the deCODE BreastCancerTM test provides
additional information on their overall risk of breast cancer
since some of the test markers are shown to influence the effect
of these rare breast cancer gene mutations.
Genetics of breast cancer
Altogether about 20 to 30% of women who get breast cancer have
a family member with the disease, meaning that 70 to 80% do not
have a family history of breast cancer. Women who have a first-degree
relative (mother or sister) with breast cancer are twice as likely
as the general population to develop the disease themselves. This
indicates that genetic predisposition plays a significant role
in determining who gets breast cancer and who does not.
The genetics of breast cancer has 3 main presentations:
1) Hereditary or familial form of breast cancer segregating within
families.
2) Families with as few as 2 cases and not with strong enough
genetic effect to be obviously segregating as a hereditary condition.
3) Sporadic breast cancer, no family history of the disease.
In fact numbers 2 and 3 above may be difficult to distinguish
since breast cancer is so common that most families will have
1 or more affected with the disease and it is often just a matter
of the number of women and the degree of relatedness that are
assessed that determine how many breast cancers will be ascertained
in a family. Still there seems to be a measurable difference in
the number and degree of relatives affected for estimation of
risk in different modeling tools based measures of risk associated
with positive family history and other recognized risk factors
(see for example the Gail score model at http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/).
Hereditary breast cancer
Only a portion of patients with a family history of breast cancer
(less than 25%; 2 to 5% of all breast cancer cases) have what
qualifies as the highly heritable or familial form of breast cancer
caused by identifiable genetic mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2,
TP53, and PTEN genes. These individuals usually have a strong
family history of breast cancer, particularly of early-onset and/or
ovarian cancer cases. However, each of these mutations is very
rare, occurring in only a very small fraction of breast cancer
cases. The deCODE BreastCancerTM test does not include or detect
these rare mutations. However some of the variants in the deCODE
BreastCancerTM test modulate the risk of breast cancer in subjects
who carry mutations in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. The deCODE
BreastCancerTM test reports a factor based on the relevant SNP
genotypes by which the lifetime risk from the BRCA mutation should
be multiplied in order to determine the overall lifetime genetic
risk of breast cancer, given that the subject is diagnosed as
a carrier of a high-penetrance BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Breast cancer cases with a not so noticeable family history
15 to 20 % of breast cancer cases have 1 or more close relatives
with breast cancer but do not have so strong or characteristic
family history as to be recognized as hereditary or familial,
nor do they have mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and PTEN
genes. These patients may have heretofore unidentified genetic
variants. The risk identified by the deCODE BreastCancerTM test
seems to be largely independent of immediate family history, ie,
the risk markers identified account for only a small portion (about
5%) of these familial cases. Thus the common genetic variants
tested by the deCODE BreastCancerTM test do not explain risk due
to family history of breast cancer. In fact, numerous studies
have shown that the risk is independent of family history. This
fact makes the deCODE BreastCancerTM test all the more relevant
for this group of patients since their increased baseline risk
caused by their family history and as assessed by some of the
models available, can be multiplied by the test results.
Sporadic breast cancer
The majority (70 to 80%) of breast cancer cases arise in individuals
who do not have a noticeable family history of breast cancer.
This does not mean that these women are not genetically predisposed
to develop breast cancer. The genetic predisposition variants
they inherit may be so common in the population, of such a small
number and each with such a relatively small effect, that their
contribution to breast cancer generally surfaces as sporadic cases.
On an individual basis however, women who have several of these
genetic risk variants are at a substantially increased risk relative
to the population. The deCODE BreastCancerTM test is designed
to assess the genetic risk of the common form of breast cancer
by testing for multiple risk variants that are common in the population
and is especially useful in the 70 to 80% of the population that
does not have a family history of breast cancer.
Collectively, the deCODE BreastCancerTM markers account for about
60% of the population attributable risk, meaning that if we were
able to prevent all breast cancer cases in women that have increased
risk relative to the general population according to the deCODE
BreastCancerTM test, 60% of breast cancer would be eliminated.
In basic terms, carrying a high-risk deCODE BreastCancerTM genetic
profile does not necessarily mean that the subject will develop
breast cancer, just as having a low-risk genetic profile does
not eliminate the possibility of getting the disease. Rather,
these genetic risk variants impact the likelihood that the subject
will develop breast cancer. Nongenetic risk factors such as current
age, age at menarche, age at first live birth, hormonal history
and status, history of exposure of the chest wall to X-rays, and
previous benign or malignant breast disease may also affect a
subject’s risk of breast cancer. Genetic and nongenetic
risk factors all need to be taken into account when judging the
overall breast cancer risk of an individual patient.
Risks Identified by deCODE BreastCancer™
The deCODE BreastCancer™ test assesses the genetic risk
of breast cancer by testing for genetic risk variants that are
very common in the population, each of which contribute relatively
little, but that when combined can have a significant effect.
The deCODE BreastCancer™ test determines whether the subject
has inherited the risk or non-risk version at 7 different variable
sites in the human genome. By comparing deCODE BreastCancer™
to the general risk of women in the population it can be seen
whether the person tested has a risk greater or lower than average
population risk. The risks at each of the 7 markers are multiplied
together to define combined risks of from 0.4- to about 4.0-fold
the relative general population risk. The deCODE BreastCancerTM
test examines only genetic risk factors, so other factors such
as age and hormonal factors need to also be taken into account.
By combining the test results and risks associated with other
known risk factors a more complete lifetime risk estimate can
be generated.
Based on an individual’s genotypes for the markers, lifetime
genetic risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer can be determined
and related to the general risk of breast cancer in the population.
The deCODE BreastCancerTM test reports the subject’s measured
genetic risk of breast cancer relative to the average population
and the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer.
The relative genetic risk of breast cancer compared to the general
population determined by the test can vary from 0.45 for subjects
who no risk variants at the 7 markers, to 3.77 for subjects who
have 2 risk variants (1 on each chromosome) at all markers.
About 42% of the female population has genotype combinations
of the tested markers that confer an increased relative risk (>1)
of breast cancer. Ten percent of women in the general population
have genotypes that confer a more than 40% increase in the relative
risk of breast cancer, about 5% would be considered high risk
with a 1.66-fold or greater risk (corresponding to a lifetime
risk of 20% or greater), and approximately 1% of women have, on
average, a 3-fold risk (37% lifetime risk of breast cancer).
The risk distribution in the general population and the proportion
of the population with decreased (<1) and increased (>1)
risks according to the test are given in the figure below:
In basic terms, carrying a high-risk deCODE BreastCancer™
genetic profile does not necessarily mean that a woman will develop
breast cancer, just as having a low-risk genetic profile does
not eliminate the possibility of getting the disease. Rather,
these genetic risk variants impact the likelihood that she will
develop breast cancer. Nongenetic risk factors such as current
age, age at menarche, age at first live birth, hormonal history
and status, history of exposure of the chest wall to X-rays, and
previous benign or malignant breast disease may also affect a
woman’s risk of breast cancer. Genetic and nongenetic risk
factors all need to be taken into account when judging the overall
breast cancer risk of an individual.

The deCODE ProstateCancer™ test is a novel, non-invasive,
DNA-based reference laboratory test for the first genetic risk
factors ever found to confer risk for a common type of cancer
in the general population. These markers are not dependent on
a family history of prostate cancer – in fact, they are
independent of family history and the genetic risk of the ProstateCancer
test multiples with the family risks mentioned above. All but
one of the variants were discovered in Iceland and confirmed in
several American and European ancestry cohorts but have also been
confirmed in several other populations by independent research
groups.
Genetic Markers
The deCODE ProstateCancer ™ test identifies eight known
variants, three on chromosome 8 (in the 8q24 region), two on chromosome
17 (in regions 17q12 and 17q24.3), one on chromosome 2 (in the
2p15 region), one on chromosome 11 (the 11q13.3 region) and one
on the X-chromosome (sex chromosome; Xp11.22) . Based on the presumption
that these markers are independent, and the individual risks therefore
multiply, the various genotype combinations have associated relative
risks in the range of 0.33(non carriers for any of the risk markers)
to 17.6 (homozygous for all of the eight risk variants) compared
to the general population risk. Combined, these 8 variants appear
to account for about half of the cases of prostate cancer (sometimes
termed population attributable risk). About 40% of the population
has a genotype combination of the tested markers that have an
increased relative risk (>1) over the general population and
about 10% of the population has a genotype combinations that confer
an average two-fold relative risk and about 1% have relative risk
above 3. One should be careful to apply extreme risk results to
individuals since they are based on presumptions of a multiplicative
model and are associated with genotype combinations that are extremely
rare.
The risk distribution in the general population and the proportion
of the population with higher and lower risk as the individual
tested is given in the figure below.
Genetic risk assessment by deCODE ProstateCancer™
test
The results of the deCODE ProstateCancer are reported as the combined
genetic risk associated with the individual’s genotype combination
and as an individual lifetime risk compared to the population
lifetime risk. A graph such as the one above will be provided
that allows the individual’s risk results to be compared
to risk and genotype distribution of the general population (see
sample report on the “Result and report” web page).
Note that deCODE ProstateCancer™ only measures these 8 validated
genes. There are likely other genes that have not yet been discovered
and there are other risk factors such as family history and ethnicity
that need to be multiplied to this genetic risk to refine an individual’s
risk.

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of disorders that share a distinct
pattern of optic nerve damage. There are two basic forms of glaucoma,
open- and closed angle glaucoma. In most populations, open-angle
glaucoma, characterized by painless loss of vision, constitutes
the majority of glaucoma cases. Open-angle glaucoma is defined
as a progressive loss of neuroretinal rim tissue within the optic
disk and consequent excavation of the optic disk with corresponding
loss of visual field and is divided into primary open-angle glaucoma
and secondary glaucoma. Primary open angle glaucoma is without
an identifiable cause of aqueous outflow resistance, whereas in
secondary glaucoma including exfoliation glaucoma, the outflow
resistance is of a known cause. The prevalence of exfoliation
glaucoma increases with age, and although the disease is found
worldwide, a number of studies have pointed to a geographical
clustering of the syndrome.
Exfoliation syndrome is the most common identifiable cause of
secondary glaucoma in most populations. According to recent studies
the 15-year risk of exfoliation syndrome conversion to exfoliation
glaucoma is about 60%. Exfoliation glaucoma is characterized by
rapid progression, high resistance to medical therapy, and a worse
prognosis than in primary open angle glaucoma. Family history
is an important risk factor for both primary open angle glaucoma
and exfoliation syndrome which, together with ethnic differences
in prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma, points to a role
of genetic factors in the risk of suffering from these conditions.
The discovery of glaucoma genes provides a method for early detection
of glaucoma. Genetic testing is capable of identifying those at
highest risk for developing glaucoma. Such patients would include
family members of patients with known glaucoma gene defects and
members of families with a strong history of inherited glaucoma.
About 10-30% of all primary open angle glaucoma patients have
the LOXL1 glaucoma gene defect, but about 25 % of the general
population (white Caucasians) are positive for the test Glaucoma
gene testing of those who are at high risk for developing glaucoma
may be of value followed by regular monitoring of the eye pressure
by a physician.
|